My husband a
quiet man at times, especially if he does not know you, spent the last few months
writing his journey into the Catholic Faith. For a man who usually does not use
many words….. He had much to say. I am so proud of him and every time I asked
him if he was finished yet? He would say… “No! I have too many areas I need to
cover. This is my story and I want to get it right.”
Why do we
want to share this? In hopes of bridging a gap and help folks understand the
misunderstandings that have divided Christianity. We know we are just a small pebble in this
great big ocean in which we live. Hoping our pebble with bring a few ripples
across the waters and touch others. God Bless, Jewels
I was born the second child of a staunch Presbyterian
family; father, mother, four sisters and me. From as early as I can remember
our parents did not “send” their children to church, they “took” them. We did
Sunday school and Church service almost every Sunday. We may have protested (more
about protestation later) from time to time, but we understood we were going.
It was a part of our lives. I thank God often for the father and mother he
prepared for me. They were not perfect parents by the world’s standards, but
they were perfect for me. God does not make mistakes. What does the world
know?
I was baptized at the age of 13 months. Until I was about
five years old, I have scant memories of life; a few places and events. When I
was eight years old, we began attending St. Phillip Presbyterian Church in
Hurst, TX. There were many families with children my age, but the ones that
attended regularly only had girls my age. There I was in Sunday school
surrounded by girls. Not the ideal situation for an eight or nine year old boy,
especially a boy with four sisters! Still, I enjoyed the Bible stories, mostly
from the Old Testament, that told the ancient history of the people of God.
Great heroes like Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Joshua and
David were imperfect, yet God showed them great power and had mercy on them.
Then too, we had stories from the New Testament of Jesus healing multitudes of
people, teaching them to obey God and ultimately being crucified. Oh yes, He
was buried, rose from the dead and ascended into Heaven. Yet, the “full”
meaning of all this escaped me.
When I was thirteen, it was time for Confirmation. Yes,
the Presbyterians have, or had back then, a confirmation process. Eight or ten
weeks meeting with the Minister to “learn” the tenets of the faith
(Communicants Class), followed by a Confirmation Service. We made a profession
of faith, were received into full membership and received our first Communion
(sound sort of familiar to you Catholics?). I cannot tell you the complete
affect first Communion had on me, but as I continued to take Communion over the
years I experienced something special. I now know it was the Grace of God. I
had wondered for many years why I could not “participate” in Communion and why
my father, mother and others in the assembly would weep at the eating of flat
bread and wine. (Yes, our Presbyterian church had WINE! It was not until much
later that grape juice was offered as an alternate to wine.) I too would
well-up during the Communion Service, but would be so at peace afterword.
At this point of the story I know many Catholics are
screaming “What about examination of conscience? What about Reconciliation?
What about receiving unworthily? What about crackers and juice? What about…
What-up with dat?” Calm down already. We were taught to examine our conscience
and confess our sin and sinfulness, before receiving. Did we confess to a
Priest? Yes and no. We were more than welcome to approach our minister,
Reverend James F. Garvin (a wonderful man of God, but not a Catholic Priest…
more on this later), and discuss any manner of sin, fault or greivance. He
would assure us “in Jesus Christ you are forgiven.” Most of us confessed to the High Priest forever of the order of
Melchizedek. You might know him as Jesus Christ.
As I transitioned from junior high to high school, my church
attendance slowly declined. Eventually it was relegated to the level of holiday
celebrations. There were basically two, Easter and Christmas. Two things
occurred during this time that affected my attitude toward church attendance.
First, my dad had a “disagreement” with the church
leadership. He was a Deacon willing to serve, but something upset him so much
he resigned and rarely attended church the remainder of his life. I know
nothing of the details and never asked.
Second, I became self absorbed. I focused on working, football,
friends with little or no inclination toward spiritual development, smoking, drinking
and girls. Imagine that, smoking and drinking coexisting with football. Sure, many
players on my high school team smoked and drank their way through the season.
Young bodies can take a lot of abuse and recover quickly. Probably still
happens today with the added influence of drugs. Girls? Although I liked girls,
I never had success in this department. I was terrified of them. I feared
rejection and thought I had nothing to offer. I had three dates in three years
of high school. One of those the girl asked me, but I thought she was motivated
by her recent breakup with another guy. Enough about this. In my senior year I
quit football half way through the season and worked (money was important to
me) while moving on to a more “important” activity, experimenting with drugs.
I graduated from high school and began to work
construction. I had plenty of money, but wanted more. What better way than to
sell pot. I was not the prime North Texas Distributor, but sold it none the
less. This was a dark period in my life. I lived for money and the next high. I
worked all day, partied all night, got up the next day and repeated the cycle. This
lasted for about three years.
Then it happened. The night I returned to my apartment
after a 1,000 mile motorcycle trip, a beautiful young maiden entered my life.
What a vision of loveliness. God had placed a Jewel (Julie) in front of me to bring some light to the darkness. I
wanted desperately to ask her for a date, but was afraid of rejection. For
weeks I asked our mutual friends how she felt about me and if she would accept
a call from me (I thought she was “dating” one of them). They assured me she
would like to hear from me. I gathered up the courage and made the call, and a
date. From that point forward I spent as much time as I could with her. The
unfortunate thing is I pulled her down to my level. After four months that
included premarital sex and subsequent pregnancy, we were married. Lest you
think we were “forced”, I actually decided to ask her and miracle of miracles
she said yes.
The morning of the wedding I was extremely unsettled and
spoke to my mother about it. She said, “Why don’t you go to the church and
pray.” I do not know what I expected her to say, but pray about it was not it.
Regardless, I went. I entered the sanctuary (this was before the now all too
common auditorium), chose a pew close to the alter (yes we had an altar
table in my Presbyterian church), and began to pray. Although I had not
practiced prayer, other than the Our
Father, I poured forth my heart to God. When I ran out of words, I sat
there for some time wondering if I had even reached the ears of God. The Lord
did hear me, and the most amazing peace came over me. Later that day we said
our vows and began a new life as Mr. & Mrs.
Life came at us hard and fast. We had our first child
Jeanine. She was baptized in St. Phillip Presbyterian and we continued the
holiday tradition, Christmas and Easter. I changed jobs a few times and was
focused on providing for my new family. Three years after Jeanine, Joshua came.
Again, we had him baptized in St Phillip. I still had no desire to develop
spiritually, nor was I concerned for my family’s spiritual condition. But,
things would soon change.
One day I noticed Jewels was watching one of those “TV
preachers”, Pat Robertson. She tried to explain to me the “encounter” she had
with The Lord. Words like born again
and saved were not foreign to me, but
they were reserved for the “religious fanatics” not for the “Frozen Chosen”
Presbyterians. Unfortunately, I allowed her to explore this new fangled
religion on her own. I was a busy man. I had a full-time job and many other odd
jobs to make extra money. My God
demanded hard work. Then it happened again.
Jewels had been
talking with an old family friend, Betty. She and her husband Dick had invited
us to their house in Dallas for an overnight stay. We showed up with two kids,
an appetite and a jug of wine. Jewels and Betty discussed all manner of
religion, while Dick and I killed the jug and solved the world’s problems. The
next morning, Easter Sunday, Jewels, Betty, the kids and I went to church, a
new mega-church in Farmer’s Branch, TX. Dick had no time for this nonsense; you
see, he was a cradle Catholic and rarely attended Mass. After a short drive, we
entered the gigantic auditorium, found some seats, and settled in for the
Easter service, or should I say entertainment. First, Pastor Bob Tilton,
followed by “reformed and saved” Little
Richard (yes, the Little Richard) and
finally a man named Norvel Hayes. He presented the “Pentecostal” gospel of
Jesus Christ. I listened intently. At the end Mr. Hayes announced the “altar
call”. Altar call? Where was the altar?
The only thing I saw was a stage and some couches. Must be part of the new
fangled religion. As some folks made their way forward I waited in silence
thinking of how hungry I was. Then something happened. I apparently had
received some sort of “enlightenment”.
Where did that come from? Should I stay, or should I go forward. The conflict raged in my mind. I was
Frozen Chosen! Then, a well placed elbow to my ribs had me in the aisle
(I have this thing about aisle seats. They are a must for me.) The Jewels from
God had forced me to confront God. I shuffled down the aisle to the stage, I
mean “altar”. There Mr. Hayes led us in the “sinner’s prayer” and prayed over
us. No magic. No bright light. After a while the hunger pangs returned and I had
to find my way back to the family. There were high fives all around, but I was
hungry. Let us go and be filled. In the parking lot Betty was explaining
healing. For whatever reason I mentioned a knot on my wrist that would come and
go throughout my life. It was painful when it appeared and it was present that
morning. She slammed the car in park, grabbed my wrist and began to pray. I was
appreciative, but I needed to eat. Jewels, the kids and I returned to our home
later that afternoon.
The next morning I awoke and readied myself for work. As
I went through my morning routine, I noticed the knot on the wrist was gone. I
had full range of motion and no pain. This was not completely unusual; however,
it had never disappeared that quickly. I was just happy the pain was gone and
expected it to return some day. It never has returned. Praise God.
Within a few days Jewels purchased a pocket New Testament
for me to read at work during lunch. The first day I opened it I devoured verse
after verse. My coworkers were amazed that I could not put it down. The
Scriptures came alive and I began the painfully slow process of conversion. I
was starting to grasp a fuller meaning of crucifixion, death and resurrection.
We began attending an Assembly of God church in Cleburne,
TX. There were some wonderful Christian people there. We did not concern
ourselves with doctrinal issues and theology, we had Christ! The importance of
doctrine and theology would be learned much later. Fellowship and worship with
other professing Christians was comforting.
After two years, we believed the Lord was calling us into
a vastly different phase of life. After much prayer and discussion, we sold all
our worldly goods, save a few, and moved to south Texas, Kingsville that is.
There I attended college working toward a degree in Mechanical Engineering.
Jewels worked ten hours a day, 6 days a week. I carried a full load of classes
year round and raised the kids. We had “no time” for church, although we did
visit a few. God was put on the back burner after having called us to endure
this phase; however, He never failed to provide our needs.
Three and a half years later we moved to Waco, TX where I
was once again gainfully employed as a rocket motor designer. God had blessed
us with a good job and we experienced the fruits of our labor during the
college years. Again, we visited a few churches, but were not truly seeking
fellowship with Christians. We wandered through life for three years in Waco
and found ourselves dissatisfied and wanting a change.
I was offered a job in Huntsville, Alabama as a rocket
motor Project Engineer. We purchased our first and only “new” house. We had
owned others, but this one was built for us. Several new friends came into our
lives. They were good people, but most of them were not regular church
attendees. Jewels seriously desired spiritual development and I was content to
ride what I call “the velvet lined rut.” She suggested we visit an Assembly of
God church a few miles from our house and I agreed. We attended regularly for
about a year. One Sunday morning during the opening praise & worship
session, the Lord clearly spoke to my heart saying, “Join this church.” I told
Jewels after the service and she said, if I was sure, we should speak to the
pastor. We spoke. We joined and began an interesting phase of our spiritual
journey.
We became very involved in many aspects of the church.
Jeanine and Josh became involved in all youth activities. Jewels and I led
Children’s Church and helped with other youth activities. I was elected to the
Board of Trustees. It seemed we were at the church more than we were at home
and we loved it. Then, it began to unravel. We discovered how mean and cruel
some “Christians” can be. I will spare you the details, but bearing false
witness and theft were involved. People accused me of using my position as a
Trustee to take control of the church! I was astounded and resigned. We left
the church and sought a short period of reflection. A few visits to a
Presbyterian church did little to heal the wounds we suffered at the hands of
“Christians.” Shortly after, we moved to a new job in Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania was new and exciting, but from the very
beginning we searched for a church. A few Assemblies of God were visited, but
nothing clicked. Jewels had been reading about the Presbyterian Church of
America (PCA). After several visits we were encouraged to study “church
history” with one of the Elders. The “history” basically started in 1500 AD.
Imagine that? Well the more studying we did, the more confused we became. What
is this Calvinist understanding of predestination? What was this Calvinist
theology? I did not get this at St Phillip. Why was the minister so anti
Catholic? Well, he had grown up in a Catholic family, but something had turned
him against Catholicism. He was firmly convinced the Pope was the antichrist
and all Roman Catholics were following him to hell. Imagine that? In all my
years in the Presbyterian Church I had never experienced such a prejudice.
Heck, my parents allowed me to occasionally attend Mass with the Catholic family
that lived behind us. The only derogatory (if you can call it that) thing they
ever said about Catholicism was “They are the people that have a lot of kids.”
My parents said that? With five kids? Kind of funny, huh?
After two years attending that church we decided to
leave. We just could not subscribe to the Calvinist theology. There were some
good people there, but we just did not understand the teaching. I felt many of
folks there thought they were the only ones having the “keys to the Kingdom”
and unless we joined, our souls would be in serious jeopardy. The one thing the
experience taught us was there is more to church history than 1500 AD to 2000
AD. So, off we went searching for another Assemblies of God. Remember, that was
the first church experience following our “real awakening” to the Gospel and we
had spent several years in that environment. Two more years in two different
Assemblies churches and my job ended. The search for another job landed us back
in Texas in the small town of Bellville.
The search was on again. First, we visited a couple of
Assemblies churches; one in Bellville and one 17 miles up the road in Brenham
(home to Blue Bell Ice Cream). We stayed at the one in Brenham for quite some
time, not because of the people, preaching or scenic drive, but because we
could go to a real good Mexican buffet after church (that is my opinion). Next
we moved on to a non denominational group meeting in a private residence. Again
all were good Christian folks, but something was missing. I was struggling with
how the “preacher”, a full time pest control man, got his credentials to
preach. Where, and by whom, was he ordained? Don’t get me wrong, he was a good
Christian man and preached within the orthodoxy of mainline Protestantism, but
by what authority (more on this later)? Finally, we visited a Lutheran Church,
Baptist Church, Cowboy Church and then a Bible Church. Guess what? We moved
again.
Our next stop was, and still is, Magnolia, Arkansas. This
is where it gets interesting. After 25 years of wandering in the desert, we
were still searching for the “Promised Land”. Let me tell you, this is a
Baptist town. There are no less than 25 Baptist Churches within a 20 minute
drive of our house. Well, we ignored them for a couple of years and visited an
Assemblies church (definitely a heavy spiritual struggle there) and a non
denominational church. Finally, we gave the Baptists a chance. Everywhere we
attended there were many good Christian people, but I just could not understand
where some of the theology was developed, or by what authority it was
delivered.
After a particularly interesting “Bible Study” on Sunday
evening, I told Jewels, “I guess we should visit the Catholic Church. Maybe
there we will be free from the ‘demon of alcohol’ syndrome.” Many folks at
churches we visited here hold the opinion that someone who drinks alcohol, even
in moderation, is on the fast track to hell. Well, I enjoy beer. I like to make
beer. It tastes good with Bar-B-Q and Mexican food. I do not abuse alcohol and
I can go for months without a beer, but I do not like others determining my
eternal fate based on whether or not alcohol passes my lips.
For several years Jewels’ uncle and aunt had politely
discussed with us the historical, theological and doctrinal background of the
Catholic Church. Most of the time I listened, and then questioned certain
positions or statements. The primary roadblock to going further into
Catholicism was the “real presence” in the Communion bread and wine. The
concept of transubstantiation was difficult for me to grasp. Also, I could not
understand why we were restricted from participating in the “Communion” portion
of the Mass.
After my statement about visiting the Catholic Church,
Jewels began to investigate; service time, Sunday school, Bible Study, etc. I
will leave that story to her. We finally had a Sunday morning set aside to
attend the first Mass where we were going to “understand” what Catholics do. We
were totally overwhelmed and lost! The Priest was from Nigeria and had an
accent so thick you needed a chainsaw to cut it. A knife was out of the
question. I had no idea what the Homily was supposed to tell me. Do not
misunderstand. Father Pius was a wonderful man of God. He spoke 6 languages (I
think), but he carried an accent when speaking English. From what I was told,
his accent was almost nonexistent when he spoke Spanish. As I mentioned
earlier, I had been allowed to attend Catholic Mass as a child, but I did not
remember exactly how long Catholics were on their knees (I was younger with
better knees). We did not kneel that day, but it still seemed like a long time.
However, there were two things I understood; the Nicene Creed and the Our
Father. Both were said every week at St. Phillip Presbyterian. My mother had
taught her children “The Lord’s Prayer” as soon as we could speak, and we each
said it every night before bedtime.
We discussed our first experience at Immaculate Heart of
Mary (IHOM) with mixed emotions. Jewels was discouraged and I was confused, but
we decided to continue attending. There are many stories of our early days at
IHOM, but three key things happened. First, I trained my ears to cut through
Father Pius’ Nigerian accent so as to understand the Homily and prayers,
especially the Eucharistic Prayer. I discovered what a wonderful man of God he
was and I love him to this day. I began to see the Liturgy as “soaked” in
Scripture. Second, I began to participate, as fully as I could, in the Mass. I
would kneel at the appropriate time, make the appropriate responses, and take
in fully the new things. One new thing was the Gloria. What a wonderful
expression of God and to God. (A side note here; I loved the older version as
we sang it, but it has been slightly modified to a more “accurate”
Latin-to-English translation. Still it is beautiful, but does not flow as well
as the older version did for me.) Finally, we enrolled in The Rite of Christian
Initiation for Adults (RCIA). Our RCIA instructor was willing to discuss the Catechism
of the Catholic Church with us, and I think it forced him to dig much deeper
into the Catholic faith than he had gone before. He did his best with what few
resources were available at our Parish. He was a cradle Catholic with the heart
to serve, but was unable to answer some of the deep questions from us Protestants.
The second time we went through RCIA, a more
comprehensive and structured lesson plan was available. About half way through
the class Jewels and our daughter Jeanine decided to “join”, or “convert to”,
the Catholic Faith. I remained committed to studying and discerning further.
Most folks thought I was just dragging my feet, but I was still unsure of that
sticking point of the “real presence” in the Eucharist. I finished year two of
RCIA.
Our former instructor moved his family to Florida and a
new instructor took the reins. He was always well prepared because the new
Priest at our Parish brought with him an excellent RCIA program. This was much
needed in our Parish and I thank Father Hart for the material and guidance it
has made to all who attend. The new RCIA instructor, a cradle Catholic, was forced
to dig deep into the Catechism and discovered more than he ever knew about
Catholicism. An unexpected consequence of the RCIA instruction experience has
changed his life. For four more years I read and listen too many of the
Catholic world’s premier apologists discuss all facets of the faith. I prayed
during adoration. Sound funny? “What is Adoration”, you ask? It is prayer and contemplation
in front of the Blessed Sacrament, the Most Holy Sacrament, the Real Presence,
Christ physically present. Yes, I attended adoration on several occasions; at
the Catholic Charismatic Conference, at retreats and at church. I received no
answer, whether God did not speak or I did not hear. This was a most
frustrating time in my life. I truly sought an answer, but it escaped me.
Sometimes we must rely on the measure of faith God has given us.
Then it happened. The Lord spoke to me during my morning
drive to work. I listed to a talk radio show during those drives and the focus
of the host is original intent of the US Constitution. To fully appreciate the
Constitution’s creation and purpose, one must read from the volumes of letters,
notes and debate transcriptions of those who framed and ratified the document.
These people are known as the founding fathers of our nation. Well, the Lord
reminded me that the Church had founding fathers, and I should consider the
volumes they wrote during its founding and development. I had read many things
written by the Church fathers, but as many people do. I accepted what fit with my
theology and ignored the rest. For the next several months I considered
three basic things.
My Presbyterian
Experience
I considered similarities between St. Phillip
Presbyterian (form my childhood) and the Catholic Church. For 4-5 years I had
heard the statement “Protestants do this or that” and I did not remember doing
“this or that”. At other times I heard “Protestants believe this or that”.
Again, I did not remember “this or that”. As I thought back on the structure at
St. Phillip, I realized some striking similarities. Hang on to your hat, it
will be enlightening. Reverend Garvin (remember, I said he was not a Catholic
Priest) wore vestments. Granted, they were not as elaborate as today’s priest
wears, but vestments none the less. He wore a black robe with collar and stole.
The stole changed colors over the course of each year, and the cloths draped
over the lectern and alter matched the minister’s stole. Sound familiar? His
daily attire was black shirt with clerical collar and black slacks. Sounds very
much like a priest.
Sunday service was structured as follows:
Entrance
Procession – The massive choir began at the rear of the sanctuary
and proceeded up the center aisle. They continued back down the outer aisles
and into the choir loft. The choir was followed by the acolytes with candle
lighters in hand and Rev. Garvin last. Imagine that, candles in church! Can you
find a Protestant church today that has candles burning during the worship
service?
Greeting – Rev.
Garvin greeted the congregation in the name of the Lord and offered up a prayer.
The
Call to Worship – Rev. Garvin encouraged all to call to mind
their sinful shortcomings and ask for forgiveness, in order to enter into
worship. Sometimes this was a silent act and other times it was vocalized as
written in the bulletin.
The
Assurance of Forgiveness – Rev. Garvin would assure the faithful
that in Jesus Christ we were forgiven and say “Lord have mercy, Christ have
mercy, Lord have mercy.” The congregation responded in kind after each.
A
Reading from the Old Testament – A passage from one of the
Old Testament Books was read by a Lector.
Responsorial
Reading from the Psalms – A passage from one of the Psalms was
read by a Lector with appropriate congregational response.
A
Reading from the Epistles – A passage from one of the New
Testament Epistles was read by a Lector.
A
Reading from the Gospels – A passage from one of the New
Testament Gospels was read by Rev. Garvin.
The
Sermon – Rev. Garvin explained life application of the
Scripture readings.
The
Offering – Self explanatory
The
Intercessory Prayer – Rev. Garvin prayed for the needs of the
world.
The
Benediction – Rev. Garvin pronounced a blessing (below)
and sent the congregation out to live for Christ.
Jude
1:24-25(NKJV)
24 Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to present
you faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy, 25
To God our Savior, Who alone is wise, be glory and majesty, dominion
and power, both now and forever. Amen.
The
Recessional – The choir sang a song as the acolytes
extinguished the candles, then the acolytes and Rev. Garvin exited down the
center aisle.
All of this is a mirror of the Mass, save the Eucharistic
Prayer and the receiving of Body and Blood. We did not celebrate Communion
every Sunday, but when we did, it went something like this. The gifts were
brought to the altar. The Rev. Garvin would position himself behind the alter
and recite words eerily similar the Eucharistic Prayer of the Mass. The gifts
were held aloft as the words were spoken. We were assured the Bread and Wine
“representing” the Body and Blood of our Savior would give us life. We were
encouraged to examine our conscience and partake in a worthy manner. The
elements were distributed by Communion ministers.
As I continued to reflect on how closely the service
followed the Mass, I could not help asking myself, “Where did that come from?”
The answer is, before The Reformation. Originally, the reformers did not desire
to wipe out all vestiges of the Catholic Church or the Mass. Rather, Martin
Luther wanted the abuse of Indulgences to be addressed by the Bishops. His Ninety-five Theses were more of an
academic challenge to doctrinal positions than an absolute challenge of
authority. Whether the Bishops were too slow or Luther was too impatient, I do
not know. What I do know is Pope Leo X, a dubious character at best, demanded
Luther retract his writings. Nowhere do I find evidence Leo X attempted to
address each academic challenge. Quite possibly he was too busy enjoying the
fruits of indulgence sales where they were being accomplished and involving
himself in the secular political affairs of Europe. Leo X was known for his own
self indulgence to the material good life. Luther refused to retract (rejected
the Papal Authority) and Leo X excommunicated him. The unfortunate result was a
sinful hardening of hearts on both sides, leading to a separation lasting 500
years. As the years have passed, more and more of the ”Traditions” have been
eradicated or replaced by the Protestant denominations. I am extremely thankful
that Reverend Garvin was more “catholic” than anyone realized. Many of the
Sacred Traditions handed down for 2,000 years were in effect outside of the
Catholic Church and reflected at St Phillip Presbyterian. It afforded me the
privilege of being brought up in a liturgy very close to the Church of
antiquity.
The
Apostolic Succession
This topic is a huge
hindrance to Protestants accepting Catholicism. I think the biggest hurdle is
the idea of being under “authority”. Humans, by nature, reject authority. It is
at the root of our sinfulness. The first parents, Adam and Eve, rejected God’s
authority and men and women have been rejecting it since that Original Sin. If
we are prone to reject the authority of the Creator of the universe, how much
more would we reject the authority of another human being claiming to be the
Vicar of Christ; Christ’s representative on earth to guide the faithful. Why
did Christ continually speak in terms of sheep and shepherds? We are like
sheep! As salvation history will attest, humans need real, present authority
to keep them from going astray. Read the Mosaic Law. Read about the Prophets
and how the children of God (Israel) rejected their authority and killed them.
Read about the Kings of Israel and how they rejected the Prophets and fell into
great sin. Yes, God had Prophets to provide authority over the Kings! Without
the presence of authority we wander into all manner of debauchery. As I see it,
God left the following after the ascension of Christ
1) Real,
present Holy Spirit – available to all Baptized
2) Real
, present human authority – Peter (as the first) with successors
3) Real
Presence – Sacrament of Communion or Eucharist
Consider the following passage from Matthew:
Matthew
16:15-19 (NKJV)
15He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16Simon
Peter answered and said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you,
Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but
My Father who is in heaven. 18And I also say to you that
you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades
shall not prevail against it. 19And I will give you
the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and
whatever you bind on earth £will be bound in heaven, and whatever
you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”
This passage has been explained by many a Protestant like
this: Simon Peter confesses that Jesus is the Messiah. And on that confession
Christ would build His church. The keys to the Kingdom of Heaven were that
believers can bind Satan and loose people from the bondage of demons. When
viewed in light of Isaiah 22, there is clarity of keys and binding and loosing.
Isaiah
22:20-23 (NKJV)
20 ‘Then it shall be in that day, that I will call my servant
Eliakim the son of Hilkiah; 21 I will clothe him with
your robe and strengthen him with your belt; I will commit your responsibility
into his hand. He shall be a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem And to the
house of Judah. 22 The key of the house of David I will lay on his shoulder; so he shall
open, and no one shall shut; and he shall shut, and no one shall open. 23 I will fasten him as a peg in a secure place, and
he will become a glorious throne to his father’s house.
In this passage God is promising to transfer authority (key of the house of David) to Eliakim.
He can open and no one can shut. He can shut and no one can open. Sound like
authority to you? Jesus was transferring authority to Peter to deal with sin.
And how was Peter to deal with sin? The Sacrament of Reconciliation or, as it
is commonly known, Confession. It is appropriate to insert Confession here,
since it is part of the “authority”. Before I entered into full communion with
the Catholic Church, I was drawn to the idea Confession. Regular confessing
one’s sins is a must throughout this life. Nobody is sin free for long. It is
in our nature. God demands confession and repentance when we give in to our
sinful nature. Without confession, one cannot be in “right standing” with God.
John says:
1
John 1:8-10 (NKJV)
8If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth
is not in us. 9If we confess our sins, He is faithful
and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness. 10If we say that we have not sinned,
we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.
When he says “we” he is including himself. If John needed
to confess his sin, I certainly need to confess mine. Most Protestant folks
would say, “I can go straight to Jesus and confess my sin.” This is very true,
but I found something special in confessing to a priest. If you truly want to
experience humility, confess your sins to a Catholic priest.
I was told by many that I could not participate in the Sacrament
of Reconciliation unless I was Catholic. I refused to accept this position. I
asked our priest if he would hear my confession. He said he would ask the
Bishop. Well, the Bishop said sure. I read a small pamphlet about examination
of conscience and preparation for Reconciliation. I was nervous when I entered
the confessional the first time. Would I remember the “word formula”? Would I chicken out? I found out there is no
exact word formula. The “formula” is simply this: Examine conscience, approach
in humility, admit your sins & sinfulness, perform an act of contrition
(express true sorrow) and ask for forgiveness. When I was done, the priest pronounced
absolution. He absolved me of my sin giving me a special peace. This is the
loosing of sin on earth and loosing of sin in heaven. How can he do this? The
priest has received the authority from Jesus, as in Matthew 16: 15-19, through apostolic
succession; succession from Peter and the other Apostles. All bishops and
priests receive the authority to act in “the person of Christ” when ordained,
and loose the confessed sins of the faithful.
As I considered apostolic succession, wondered why there
were so many theologies and doctrinal positions within the “Christian
community”. Many years of reading Scripture brought to mind specific passages.
One in particular kept returning; John 17: 20-23.
John 17:20-23 (NKJV)
20“I do not pray for these alone, but also for those who will
believe in Me through their word; 21that they
all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also
may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me. 22And
the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We
are one: 23I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect
in one, and that the world may know that You have sent Me, and have loved them
as You have loved Me.
Why did Jesus pray for unity, but there was little unity
in the faithful? Unity was not meant to be unity of professed faith in Jesus
Christ, as I had been taught and accepted. Unity of “profession” is a weak
position when one considers the totality of Scripture. Take for instance Romans
12:4-5.
Romans
12:4-5 (NKJV)
4For as we have many members in one body, but all the members do not
have the same function, 5so we, being many, are
one body in Christ, and individually members of one another.
Paul is leading into specific gifts given each member of
the body, but the gist of these verses is many members of one body; one
body in Christ. Again in I Corinthians 12:12-14 Paul speaks of many members of one
body and one body in Christ. Not only that, but by one Spirit baptized into one
body.
1
Corinthians 12:12-14 (NKJV)
12For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members
of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ. 13For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one
body—whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free—and have all been made to drink
into one Spirit. 14For in fact the body is not one
member but many. 15If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand,
I am not of the body,” is it therefore not of the body? 16And if the
ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I am not of the body,” is it
therefore not of the body? 17If the whole body were an eye,
where would be the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where would
be the smelling? 18But now God has set the members, each one of
them, in the body just as He pleased.19And if they were all
one member, where would the body be?
20But now indeed there are many members, yet one body. 21And
the eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you”; nor again the head to
the feet, “I have no need of you.” 22No, much rather, those members
of the body which seem to be weaker are necessary. 23And those members
of the body which we think to be less honorable, on these we bestow greater
honor; and our unpresentable parts have greater modesty,
24but our presentable parts have no need. But God composed
the body, having given greater honor to that part which lacks it, 25that
there should be no schism in the body, but that the members should have
the same care for one another. 26And if one member suffers, all the
members suffer with it; or if one member is honored, all the members
rejoice with it.
27Now you are the body of Christ, and members individually.
Again, in Ephesians 4 oneness is the theme; one
body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one
God. Christ is the head and has joined the whole body, according to His desire
to effectively work and grow the body in love.
Ephesians 4:1-6 (NKJV)
1I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy
of the calling with which you were called, 2with all
lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love,
3endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the
bond of peace. 4There is one body and one Spirit,
just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5one Lord, one
faith, one baptism; 6one God and Father of all, who is
above all, and through all, and in you all…11And He Himself gave
some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors
and teachers, 12for the equipping of the saints for the work of
ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, 13till we all come
to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect
man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; 14that
we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every
wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of
deceitful plotting, 15but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up
in all things into Him who is the head—Christ— 16from whom the whole
body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the
effective working by which every part does its share,
causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.
There is so much oneness in the New Testament, yet so
much disunity in the Christian community. Why are there differing opinions concerning
evil in the world within the Christian community? Why are there differing
opinions about suffering in this life within the Christian community? Why are
there differing opinions of the sanctity of life within the Christian
community? Why are there tens of thousands of doctrinal positions and beliefs
within the Christian community? Did God intend His prayer for unity to be
disunity? Did God establish His one holy catholic and apostolic
church (read the Nicene Creed accepted by many Protestant churches) to be separated?
Obviously Jesus made a mistake in John 17, did he not? No mistake was made by the Lamb without blemish, the Perfect
Sacrifice.
Finally, we have John 20:19-23 as a reinforcing of John
16:15-19.
John
20:19-23 (NKJV)
19Then, the same day at evening, being the first day of the
week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled, for fear of
the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them, “Peace be
with you.” 20When He had said this, He showed them His hands
and His side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. 21So
Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send
you.” 22And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and
said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23If you forgive the sins of
any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are
retained.”
Jesus sent the disciples as the Father sent Him. He sends
the disciples, with the authority to forgive or retain sins. These disciples
were the very ones being used by Jesus to build his church. These were ordinary
sinful (as we all are) men, but with the power to forgive or not forgive sins
of the people. What an awesome responsibility, and I have no doubt that along
with this power, Jesus expected the apostles to establish His church in unity.
He left them with no particular or specific “structure”, but with the Holy
Spirit to guide them into all truth and righteousness. In John 21, three times
Jesus commands Peter to feed His sheep. How does one feed sheep? By leading
them to green pastures. By using a rod and staff to nudge and comfort them. By
watching for the predators that seek to devour them (a dead sheep cannot be
fed). There is definitely an indication of Jesus’ desire to form a leadership
structure in the unified church.
History is littered with facts of popes being less than
holy in their duties. I pointed out one earlier in this document. The same can
be said of many Protestant leaders. I will not play the game of “your leader
was worst than mine”. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God; me,
you and all leaders secular and religious. But, the interesting fact is God has
preserved the Catholic Church with unchanging doctrinal positions throughout
2,000 years. Do not think the Church will one day acquiesce and approve of
sacrificing children on the altar of convenience (abortion). No, the sanctity
of life will be preserved regardless of the pressure from godless heathen
rulers of any stripe!
The
Eucharist
Now I come to the Sacrament of Holy Communion. This was my
biggest stumbling block to entering into full communion with the Catholic Church.
Once the issue of apostolic succession was settled, it was somewhat easier to accept the “real presence” in the Eucharist. If
I accepted apostolic succession, I should be able to accept the teaching and
Tradition the apostles and their successors (Magisterial Office) preserved for
2,000 years.
For more than six years I sorely missed the partaking of
Communion. It was a special participation in the Lord’s grace each time I received
as a wandering “Presbyterian”. Many times I would contemplate attending the
Presbyterian Church in order to receive Communion, but something kept me from
it.
All Catholic apologists continually refer to John 6: 22
& following for the roots of the real presence.
John 6:22-31 (NKJV)
22On the following day, when the people who were standing on the
other side of the sea saw that there was no other boat there, except that one £which
His disciples had
entered, and that Jesus had
not entered the boat with His disciples, but His disciples had gone away alone—
23however, other boats came from Tiberius, near the place where they
ate bread after the Lord had given thanks— 24when the people
therefore saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they also got into
boats and came to Capernaum, seeking Jesus. 25And when they found
Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, “Rabbi, when did You come
here?” 26Jesus answered them and said, “Most assuredly, I say to
you, you seek Me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate of the
loaves and were filled. 27Do not labor for the food which perishes,
but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will
give you, because God the Father has set His seal on Him.” 28Then
they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” 29Jesus
answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him
whom He sent.” 30Therefore they said to Him, “What sign will You
perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? 31Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is
written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”
The previous day Jesus performed the miracle of loaves
and fishes. Several thousand “sheep” were fed from 5 loaves of bread and 2
small fish. Jesus blessed and broke the loaves and likewise the fishes. The
bread and fishes were distributed to thousands of people and when they had been
satisfied, there were twelve full baskets of leftovers. After crossing the Sea
of Galilee, Jesus launches into the “Bread of Life Discourse” of John 6: 32-58.
Why did the “sheep” follow Him to the other side of the sea? They wanted more
bread and fish. Jesus knew they did not come because of the miracle they
witnessed, but because they wanted full bellies. He told them the bread eaten
the previous day perishes, but they should work for the bread that “endures to
everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give you”. Interestingly enough
they asked what works they should do for God. And Jesus says the work of God is
to believe in Jesus. Well, they must have a sign to believe in Him! The sign
their fathers witnessed to believe in Moses was the manna from Heaven. The
crowd thought Moses provided the manna. Jesus quickly sets them straight:
John
6:32-41 (NKJV)
32Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did
not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from
heaven. 33For the bread of God is He who comes down
from heaven and gives life to the world.” 34Then they
said to Him, “Lord, give us this bread always.” 35And
Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never
hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. 36But
I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. 37All
that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by
no means cast out. 38For I have come down from
heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39This
is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should
lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40And
this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and
believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last
day.”
God gives the true bread, He (Jesus) who comes down from
Heaven and gives life to the world. Whoever comes to Jesus will never hunger,
and believes in Him will never thirst. If you see him and believe in Him you
will have everlasting life. Sounds pretty straightforward, right? Read on.
John 6:41-42 (NKJV)
41The Jews then complained about Him, because He said, “I am the
bread which came down from heaven.” 42And they said,
“Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is
it then that He says, ‘I have come down from heaven’?”
The Jews complained. How could
this guy claim to be from Heaven? We know Him. He is just the old carpenter’s
son. We know that family! He certainly is not from Heaven. As you read further,
notice how Jesus points to the prophets. The prophets of the Old Testament clearly
taught that those who heard and learned from God would recognize Jesus, the
Messiah, when He appeared. In fact, Jews would be drawn by God to Jesus, if they knew the prophet’s teachings.
John 6:43-58 (NKJV)
43Jesus
therefore answered and said to them, “Do not murmur among yourselves. 44No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me
draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. 45It
is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Therefore
everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to Me. 46Not
that anyone has seen the Father, except He who is from God; He has seen the
Father. 47Most assuredly, I say to you, he who
believes in Me has everlasting life. 48I am the bread
of life. 49Your fathers ate the manna in the
wilderness, and are dead. 50This is the bread which
comes down from heaven, that one may eat of it and not die. 51I
am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread,
he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I
shall give for the life of the world.” 52The Jews
therefore quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this Man give us His
flesh to eat?” 53Then Jesus said to them, “Most
assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink
His blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats My
flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last
day. 55For My flesh is food indeed, and My blood is drink
indeed. 56He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood
abides in Me, and I in him. 57As the living Father
sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who feeds on Me will live
because of Me. 58This is the bread which came down
from heaven—not as your fathers ate the manna, and are dead. He who eats this
bread will live forever.”
Jesus goes on to say he is the
bread from Heaven. The fathers ate manna and are dead, but anyone who eats of
the true bread will live forever, and this true bread is His flesh! Say what? There
was a quarrel. He is going to give us His flesh to eat? How can He do that?
This is hard to swallow! (pun intended) I count no less than the following:
1)
Jesus is the Bread of Life – 4 times
2)
Manna did not provide eternal life (as
the Jews thought) – 3 times
3)
Eat the Flesh – 5 times
The discourse continues:
John
6:59-66 (NKJV)
59These things He said in the synagogue as He taught in Capernaum. 60Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this,
said, “This is a hard saying; who can understand it?” 61When
Jesus knew in Himself that His disciples complained about this, He said to
them, “Does this offend you? 62What then if
you should see the Son of Man ascend where He was before? 63It
is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak
to you are spirit, and they are life. 64But
there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the beginning
who they were who did not believe, and who would betray Him. 65And
He said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has
been granted to him by My Father.” 66From that time
many of His disciples went back and walked with Him no more.
This is a hard saying. Who can
believe it? I was previously under the impression the closing words spoken by
Jesus were indicating symbolic meaning – “the Spirit gives life; the flesh
profits nothing.” But just now as I write this, I see a more perfect meaning in
context. Jesus says the words he speaks are spirit and life, but some do not
believe. Jesus knew from the beginning those who would betray Him, then once
more said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me
unless it has been granted to him by My Father.” Those who are seeking Jesus,
the Father will grant him to believe. Fast forward to John 13:
John
13:15-20(NKJV)
15For I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done
to you. 16Most assuredly, I say to you, a servant is not greater
than his master; nor is he who is sent greater than he who sent him. 17If
you know these things, blessed are you if you do them. 18“I do not
speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture
may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats bread with Me has lifted up his
heel against Me.’ 19Now I
tell you before it comes, that when it does come to pass, you may believe that
I am He. 20Most assuredly, I say to you, he who receives
whomever I send receives Me; and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me.”
21When
Jesus had said these things, He was troubled in spirit, and testified and said,
“Most assuredly, I say to you, one of you will betray Me.” 22Then
the disciples looked at one another, perplexed about whom He spoke. 23Now
there was leaning on Jesus’ bosom one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved. 24Simon
Peter therefore motioned to him to ask who it was of whom He spoke. 25Then,
leaning back on Jesus’ breast, he said to Him, “Lord, who is it?” 26Jesus
answered, “It is he to whom I shall give a piece of bread when I have dipped it.”
And having dipped the bread, He gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son
of Simon. 27Now after the piece of bread, Satan entered him. Then
Jesus said to him, “What you do, do quickly.”
28But no one at the table knew for what reason He said this to him. 29For
some thought, because Judas had the money box, that Jesus had said to him, “Buy
those things we need for the feast,” or that he should give something to
the poor. 30Having received the piece of bread, he then went out
immediately. And it was night.
It is unclear whether or not Judas actually ate the
“dipped” bread/morsel, or just took it and left the room. Theologians (Catholic
included) are divided over this, but regardless of whether Judas ate it or took
it and left, I see it like this:
1) Judas
took it and left – he did not believe and as a result he betrayed Jesus, and
then hanged himself.
2) Judas
took, ate unworthily and then hanged himself.
Either way there is unbelief and the end result was the
same. However, Peter and nine others took, ate worthily and when they
betrayed Jesus (yes, they did by denial), they repented and were restored
because they believed. Do not think I have miscounted. John did not deny the
Christ. We can know from Scripture John was at the foot of the cross with The
Blessed Virgin! (She is the new Mother of all the living in Christ.
Suffice it to say, there is not enough space in this document to expand, but
Eve was the mother of all creation and Mary is the mother of all the new born
in Christ. I leave it to you to study further. Think in terms of: the Divinity of Christ, Mary as Divinity’s mother and Divinity’s purpose.)
Lest you think this is a symbolic action and worthiness
is not required, I refer you to Paul’s words in I Corinthians:
1 Corinthians 11:23-30 (NKJV)
23For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you:
that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took
bread; 24and when He had given thanks, He broke it
and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in
remembrance of Me.” 25In the same manner He
also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in
My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” 26For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup,
you proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes. 27Therefore
whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy
manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28But
let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the
cup. 29For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy
manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. 30For this reason many are weak and sick among
you, and many sleep.
If you eat and drink unworthily
by not discerning the Lord’s
body, you eat and drink judgment upon yourself. Paul says some are weak, some
are sick and some are dead because of unworthy participation!
I came to the point of
decision. There are times when reason must yield to faith. This is not to say
reason is unimportant. Faith and reason are in harmony. All doctrinal positions
were developed using faith AND reason. Scripture admonishes us to give reasons
for the hope that is in us.
1 Peter 3:15 (NKJV)
15But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be
ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope
that is in you, with meekness and fear;
From the earliest days of the
Church, there are preserved various writings composed by what are termed The Fathers of the Church. Many
Protestant theologians refer to these men and their documents. Developed in the
writings are basics of the Christian faith; the Trinity, Deity of Christ,
sacramental worship, real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. For example, one
of the very earliest, Didache, was written about 100 A.D. and contains the
basic structure of the Mass, instruction on faith & morals, basic church
government, baptism and the resurrection.
These writings formed the basis of Catholic doctrine. Other writings detail how
the Romans held a negative view of Christianity because of the Eucharist. Early
Christians professed consuming the Body,
Blood, Soul & Divinity of our Lord. Romans considered them
cannibals, part of the reason Christians were martyred. Rather than deny the
real presence in the Eucharist, they were willing to die! Later writings
develop the doctrine of Transubstantiation – how the elements of bread and wine
are changed into the actual substance of the flesh & blood of Christ, but
“hidden” by remaining bread & wine to the partaker’s senses. This is a
mystery of the Faith, the central mystery. Not all the fathers were in total
agreement in everything they wrote, but from that body of work, produced over
hundreds of years, the Magisterial Teaching Body of the church has defined,
confirmed and preserved the doctrinal positions/beliefs of Christ’s Church. This
is referred to as the “Deposit of Faith”. Where the fathers had differences
among themselves, or the Church, they yielded to the Magisterium. By the way,
the Magisterium is not just the current Pope Francis and College of Cardinals.
It is to sum total of all popes, cardinals and bishops throughout the past
2,000 years. Then the Great Schism of the eleventh century divided the Catholic
Church into East & West (actually this was brewing for 600-700 years).
There was no debate over Eucharistic real presence, but basically a
disagreement over where the “authority” resided; Rome or Constantinople. By the
way, another Leo, the IX, was involved. His legacy fared better than Leo X,
because he was canonized a Saint.
There were good popes and bad
popes. There were good cardinals and bad cardinals. There were good Bishops and
bad bishops. There were good priests and bad priests. Christ established His
Church using fallible humans and gave them the Holy Spirit to guide them into
all truth and righteousness. Dissension and struggle have been a part of the 2,000
year history, but Christ has protected the Deposit of Faith throughout that
time. The Reformation produced two strains of Christianity – the Roman Catholic
Church and Protestantism. The Catholic Church has remained essentially the same
since antiquity, save some corrections of abuse existing at the time of the
Reformation. Protestantism had produced 30,000 – 40,000 “denominational” and
“non-denominational” sects. Each has its own method of arriving at doctrinal
positions as the cultures, people, leaders or governments may demand. If
changes are not made, they divide again. Is that unity?
I worked through history,
Scripture and Tradition of the Catholic Church and moved forward in faith to
enter into full communion. I had worked through the three areas described
above, yet there was a lingering hesitancy. I wanted to have a discussion with
our new priest, Father Tony. Jewels suggested we invite him to the Chicken Coop
for supper and I could have a discussion with him after we ate. We ate and
Jewels excused herself so Father and I could do our business.
I began with a plan prepared
over the preceding weeks. I knew where I would end up and the final two or
three questions I would present to Father Tony. I was not planning to say I want to enter the Church. Well, you
know what they say: If you want to make God laugh, make your own plans. As I
spoke of issues religious, I found myself saying things I had not prepared to
say. Needless to say, God had thwarted my plan and inserted His. After what
seemed to be an eternity, Father Tony said, “Sounds to me like you are Catholic
and ready to enter the Church.” That is the amazing thing – I was more Catholic
than I thought! I still hesitated in committing to Confirmation. I asked if I
could enter as soon as
possible and not wait until the Easter Vigil, as is customary for the
Catechumens. He said the Bishop would need to approve entrance apart from the
Easter Vigil. Bishop Taylor needed to know I had completed RCIA. I left my fate
in the hands of the Bishop and we went to tell Jewels. Now, Jewels was quite
upset that she was not the first to be told. I tried to explain my plan vs.
God’s plan to no avail (over the following weeks she understood, I think).
Bishop Taylor was out of the
country on a mission trip, but Father emailed the request, assuring the Bishop
I had in fact completed at least six years of RCIA. Bishop Taylor consented,
but I envision him laughing to himself first (six years??). I was surprised and
thankful. Jewels was happy, but not satisfied. She desired I wait until Easter
Vigil so our daughter Jeanine could witness the event. She had entered The Holy
Angels Convent in Jonesboro, AR and was discerning a life consecrated to our
Lord. She would not be able to leave the Convent until after Easter. I could
not wait to receive communion. Jewels’ brain went into high gear and she
devised a plan to have my Confirmation and First Communion at the Holy Angels
Chapel. The problem with this plan was twofold. First, Bishop Taylor would once
again have to approve of this venue. Second, the sisters at Holy Angels would
have to approve. They were in the midst of celebrating 125 years in Arkansas.
Visitors were coming and going and the sisters were very busy. They also had a
feast day planned, Feast of The Holy Angels.
Bishop Taylor provided his
approval, but Jewels had not completed “negotiations” with the sisters. She had
begun the process by contacting Sister Ann Marie the Novitiate Mistress. Sister
Ann Marie was out of town, but the sister on the phone suggested Jewels speak
with the committee chair planning the feast day activities. That sister was
thrilled at the possibility, but she could not make the decision. Jewels was
then referred to the Convent Prioress, Sister Lillian Marie, who thought it was
a great idea and approved, but she did not commit without the celebration
committee chair’s concurrence. Back to the chair Jewels went, but she said she
could not make that decision. The committee members would need to approve! Well,
finally the sisters were in one accord. We desired to surprise Jeanine with the
“real” reason for attending the Feast of The Holy Angels. We said we were just
coming to help celebrate. The day was set.
Early (5:00) on the morning of
October 2, 2012, we set out for Jonesboro. Two cars; one containing me, Father
Tony and David my sponsor, the other containing Jewels, Susana, and Dalene.
Just over five hours later we were in Holy Angels Convent, about 45 minutes
prior to the start of Mass for the Feast of The Holy Angels. Jeanine was
excited to see us, but unaware of what would transpire at the Mass.
The celebration of Holy Angels
sisters being in Arkansas for 125 years was continuous goings-on throughout the
fall and many visitors were in and out to help celebrate. We were unaware of
just who was visiting that particular day. We expected to have the sisters, a
few visitors from the area and us six sojourners at Mass.
There was a Bishop from India
on sabbatical and travelling around the states. Bishop Moses had heard of the
Convent’s celebration and decided to visit. How fortuitous for me. I would have
a Bishop concelebrating with Father Tony as I entered into “full communion”
with the Catholic Church, and from India at that. Bishop Moses had another
priest travelling with him. Imagine that, three priests celebrating at my
Confirmation. A few minutes before the beginning of Mass we found out there
were three other priests visiting, and of course the Chaplin at Holy Angels – 7
priests at my confirmation, a perfect number. The perfect starting lineup:
Bishop
Moses, Father Tony, Father Sammy, Father Leonard, Father Udo, Father Mike,
Father Vu.
The chapel was full of visitors
and I was amazed at such a cloud of witnesses for my entrance. I was
overwhelmed when all seven priests prayed for my continued formation and evoked
guidance of the Holy Spirit. The moment came for my first full Eucharistic communion.
It was all I had hoped for and I have no reservations about my decision. It is
good to be Home.
